The differences between how the legal systems of countries and the concept of divine justice handle negative thoughts and actions. You assert that no country punishes its citizens for simply having negative thoughts about others because it is virtually impossible to prove what someone is thinking. If punishment were based on thoughts alone, a large portion of the population would be imprisoned since everyone has likely had negative thoughts about someone at some point.
Instead, legal systems typically come into play when someone engages in harmful or un parliamentary speech. Laws are usually concerned with actions that cause direct harm or violate societal norms. In these cases, if the actions can be proven, individuals may face consequences through the judicial system.
Where as in the court of God any mistake by thought, word and action gets punished , that is how the drama called life is designed.
It's important to note that the concept of divine justice and the belief in an afterlife or higher judgment system vary across different religions and belief systems. The idea that thoughts, words, and actions are subject to spiritual consequences is not universally accepted or shared by all individuals or cultures.
Ultimately, the statement emphasizes the contrasting approaches between legal systems and moral or spiritual frameworks when it comes to addressing negative thoughts, words, and actions. Legal systems generally focus on proven actions that cause harm, while the concept of divine justice or moral accountability may extend to thoughts and intentions as well.